Violent reactions arent necessary, isnt it? The only time violence is overlooked is fr self-defence. Even then, how do you claim self-defence? When your existence and/or well-being is/are challenged? Does it include mental games that test your very sanity, aka well-being? Varying people, different ideas.
It all starts with the state of mind; most definitely a personal preference based off your beliefs and experience. Does this mean it that it's subjective - relative only on a case-by-case basis? That's sad, and it doesnt help that this world is falling into ruing as we begin losing reason about everything that the Sun touches..

Violence is especially brutal in the form of words. Im a firm believer of the power of the human soul, the essence of will power. To get your spiritual manna affected is to be weakened in the mind. Punches dont reach the mind as apocalyptical as words do. Words hurt - a lot. Energy dissipates once the self-perceived balance is breached. Like rejection, the counter-attack form of energy might take a very long time to muster. The reason why some people hurt, so damn bad sometimes, is crystal clear. Expectations - the perceived harmless version of greed.

Humans are easy creatures. Easy, because we're weak. God created us as such so that we'd come back to fall on him, to rely on him to strengthen our spirits. God is great that way. Allah is so great, so powerful. You cant deny that. But he's also told us, if not taught us, that we have t rely on ourselves first. We are weak, but we can be strong too. We are to do ourselves first before doing others; that is the ideal 'balance'.

So then, how valid is a 'violent reaction' in the rules of the world if we allow ourselves to do us first? 

Labels: how now brown cow, issues, why I think that I think of things like these, words of wonder